Payal v JB Hospitality Ltd [2026] NZERA 18 - Constructive dismissal, wage arrears, and premium payments
A practical summary of Payal v JB Hospitality Ltd [2026] NZERA 18. The ERA found constructive dismissal and ordered compensation, lost wages, wage and holiday arrears, and repayment of an unlawful premium payment.
This page summarises and displays the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) determination Payal v JB Hospitality Ltd [2026] NZERA 18. The Authority found the employee was constructively dismissed after serious wage and employment standards failures.
Quick facts
- Citation: Payal v JB Hospitality Ltd [2026] NZERA 18
- Determination date: 13 January 2026
- Member: Sarah Kennedy-Martin
- Location: Wellington (investigation meeting held 5 December 2024, Palmerston North)
- Employer: JB Hospitality Limited (Stunned Mullet Bar, Palmerston North)
- Director / second respondent: Manpreet Singh
What the case was about
The applicant travelled to New Zealand on an Accredited Employer Work Visa to work as a duty manager. She alleged that she was not paid wages for the first month, was underpaid for the hours worked after wage payments started, was required to pay wages to another employee, and faced working conditions (including long hours and lack of breaks) that made continuing employment untenable.
Key findings (plain English)
- Constructive dismissal: The Authority was satisfied the employer's breaches were serious enough that resignation was reasonably foreseeable.
- Wage and holiday arrears: In the absence of reliable wage and time records, the Authority relied on the evidence available and found arrears were owed.
- Premium payment: A payment directed to be made to another employee was treated as an unlawful premium payment and ordered to be repaid.
- Director involvement: Leave was granted for recovery from the director if the company defaults, under the employment standards "person involved" provisions.
- Penalties: Although penalties can be available for employment standards breaches, the Authority recorded that penalties were not able to be ordered because the penalty application was out of time.
Orders made (amounts)
The employer was ordered to pay (within 28 days)
- $22,000.00 compensation for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings (Employment Relations Act 2000, s 123(1)(c))
- $23,938.20 lost wages (Employment Relations Act 2000, s 123(1)(b))
- $17,303.07 wage and holiday arrears (Employment Relations Act 2000, s 131)
- $1,300.00 repayment of premium payment (Wages Protection Act 1983, s 12A)
- $71.55 filing fee contribution
Practical lessons for employers
- Pay correctly and on time. Non-payment is treated as a fundamental breach and can support a constructive dismissal finding.
- Keep wage and time records. Missing or unreliable records usually harms the employer's ability to defend arrears claims.
- Do not route wages through third parties. Directing an employee to pay wages to someone else can create serious legal risk (including unlawful premium payment issues).
- Breaks and minimum standards matter. Rest and meal break failures and minimum wage issues can compound liability and the seriousness of the breach.
- Penalty timing matters. If penalties are sought, the limitation period must be met.
Read the full determination
This is a public document hosted on the ERA determinations database. If the embedded document does not load on your device, use the button below to open it in a new tab.
Related articles
Browse all articlesGeorge King v Off the Wall Construction Ltd [2026] NZERA 14 - 90-day trial invalid, unjustified dismissal
In George King v Off the Wall Construction Ltd [2026] NZERA 14, the ERA held the 90-day trial was invalid because the employee had already worked (and been paid) before signing. The dismissal was unjustified and the Authority awarded lost wages and compensation.
Jagjit Singh v L&B Foods Ltd t/a Kafal Indian Cuisine [2026] NZERA 13 - Unjustified dismissal and wage arrears
Jagjit Singh v L&B Foods Ltd [2026] NZERA 13. The Authority upheld unjustified dismissal, ordered compensation and lost wages (reduced for contributory conduct), and ordered wage and public holiday arrears with interest.
Hurikawa v Walton Mountain Ltd [2026] NZERA 8 - Unjustified dismissal and remedies
Summary of Hurikawa v Walton Mountain Ltd [2026] NZERA 8. The ERA found an unjustified dismissal and ordered lost wages ($6,656) and compensation ($15,000).
JHJ v IXX [2026] NZERA 2 - Unjustified dismissal and temporary non-publication
JHJ v IXX [2026] NZERA 2 is an unjustified dismissal determination. The ERA ordered $14,040.00 gross lost wages (3 months cap) and $17,500.00 compensation, with costs reserved. The determination includes a temporary non-publication order.
