Jagjit Singh v L&B Foods Ltd t/a Kafal Indian Cuisine [2026] NZERA 13 - Unjustified dismissal and wage arrears
Jagjit Singh v L&B Foods Ltd [2026] NZERA 13. The Authority upheld unjustified dismissal, ordered compensation and lost wages (reduced for contributory conduct), and ordered wage and public holiday arrears with interest.
This page summarises and displays the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) determination Jagjit Singh v L&B Foods Ltd [2026] NZERA 13. The Authority upheld an unjustified dismissal claim, ordered a combined remedy for lost wages and compensation (reduced for contributory conduct), and also ordered wage arrears and a public holiday short-payment with interest.
Quick facts
- Citation: Jagjit Singh v L&B Foods Ltd t/a Kafal Indian Cuisine [2026] NZERA 13
- Determination date: 8 January 2026
- Member: Helen van Druten
- Investigation meeting: 8 and 19 October 2025 (Auckland)
- Applicant: Jagjit Singh (kitchen hand, AEWV)
- First respondent: L&B Foods Limited (trading as Kafal Indian Cuisine)
- Second respondent: Vivek Vivek (director)
What the case was about
The employee alleged unpaid wages and leave entitlements, and claimed he was unjustifiably disadvantaged because a large proportion of his income went to rent and utilities for accommodation associated with the employer. The employer denied underpayments and said the dismissal was justified on serious misconduct.
Key findings (plain English)
- Unjustified dismissal upheld: The employer dismissed the employee without notice. The Authority found the process defects were more than minor and did not meet the fair and reasonable employer standard.
- Record-keeping failures matter: The Authority was not satisfied the employer kept an accurate record of hours worked each day, which affected the wage arrears assessment.
- Wage arrears ordered: The Authority ordered gross wage arrears plus 8 percent holiday pay, and interest.
- Public holiday short-payment: A short-payment for 1 and 2 January 2024 was ordered, plus 8 percent holiday pay.
- Rent disadvantage claim failed: The Authority found the accommodation was not a term or condition of employment and the evidence did not substantiate an unreasonable deduction claim.
- Contributory conduct reduced remedies: The Authority reduced the dismissal remedies (lost wages and compensation) by one third.
Orders made (amounts)
The employer was ordered to pay
- $8,933 within 28 working days of the determination date (reduced remedies under ss 123(1)(c)(i) and 128 of the Employment Relations Act 2000).
- $12,165 gross as wages owed, plus 8 percent holiday pay on that amount.
- $45 gross as unpaid public holiday wage entitlement for 1 and 2 January 2024, plus 8 percent holiday pay on that amount.
- Interest on the wage and public holiday amounts (after holiday pay is added), calculated under the Interest on Money Claims Act 2016.
Practical lessons
- Dismissal process must be fair. Even where misconduct is alleged, a fair investigation and a genuine opportunity to respond are typically required.
- Keep proper wage and time records. Missing or unreliable records can materially weaken an employer position on wage claims.
- Avoid informal cash arrangements. Paying partial wages in cash (or outside normal payroll records) creates obvious compliance and evidential risk.
- Accommodation and deductions should be documented. If rent or utilities are involved, keep clear written agreements and evidence of how payments are made.
Read the full determination
This is a public document hosted on the ERA determinations database. If the embedded document does not load on your device, use the button below to open it in a new tab.
Related articles
Browse all articlesPayal v JB Hospitality Ltd [2026] NZERA 18 - Constructive dismissal, wage arrears, and premium payments
A practical summary of Payal v JB Hospitality Ltd [2026] NZERA 18. The ERA found constructive dismissal and ordered compensation, lost wages, wage and holiday arrears, and repayment of an unlawful premium payment.
George King v Off the Wall Construction Ltd [2026] NZERA 14 - 90-day trial invalid, unjustified dismissal
In George King v Off the Wall Construction Ltd [2026] NZERA 14, the ERA held the 90-day trial was invalid because the employee had already worked (and been paid) before signing. The dismissal was unjustified and the Authority awarded lost wages and compensation.
Hurikawa v Walton Mountain Ltd [2026] NZERA 8 - Unjustified dismissal and remedies
Summary of Hurikawa v Walton Mountain Ltd [2026] NZERA 8. The ERA found an unjustified dismissal and ordered lost wages ($6,656) and compensation ($15,000).
JHJ v IXX [2026] NZERA 2 - Unjustified dismissal and temporary non-publication
JHJ v IXX [2026] NZERA 2 is an unjustified dismissal determination. The ERA ordered $14,040.00 gross lost wages (3 months cap) and $17,500.00 compensation, with costs reserved. The determination includes a temporary non-publication order.
